Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Horacio Castillo III/Destiny Cable Channels

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. SPI is thataway. (non-admin closure) Queen   of   Hearts ❤️  (no relation) 19:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Horacio Castillo III/Destiny Cable Channels

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Editor abandoned account right after this page was created and then jumped to, where they were blocked five years ago for complete incommunication; since then all edits have been from IPs outright violating WP:NOTTVGUIDE in userspace, and this has no purpose in article space. Also in their main userpage are the clear use of other accounts to host cable lineups in userspace that need to go (including blocked socker );


 * Cignal Channels
 * SkyCable Channels
 * Sky Direct Channels
 * G Sat Channels
 * Cablelink Channels

 Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Horacio's page. Made six years ago by someone who never did anything other than do this in userspace. Keep the others, which are in the sandboxes of users with 18-98k edits (one of whom has been blocked, but this was not created in violation of a block/ban). If there's socking going on, block the socks. There's no reason to delete these pages though. WP:NOTTVGUIDE, like many policies, applies to articles, not userspace. Who knows what the intention is with them -- to use in part in a different article, reference material for tangential projects, playing with wikimarkup/tables... in the meantime nobody will ever see them unless digging for problems in other people's userspace (or unless someone's socking to edit them, but again that's not a deletion issue). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep all, refer to WP:SPI. This looks like something that should be directed to SPI, not MFD.  Userspace policing at this level is a net negative.  These pages don’t fail userspace guidelines. The rationale seems entirely founded on socking, and the first page listed is by and in in userspace of a never-blocked user.
 * Multiple pages by multiple users in multiple users’ userspace are listed here, and this is unwieldy for a forum that is not for evaluating or clerking sock puppetry or long term abuse.
 * To the extent that the pages are slightly problematic, old and useless, the recommend action is Userpage blanked. No fuss, low cost solution, easily done and easily reversed if contested later. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.