Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hummelong

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Hummelong


Two-year old userpage found through a Wikipedia search. I've already created a properly sourced article, so this is now a content fork -- one that's indexed by Google, natch. User hasn't made any edits outside of it. Anna talk 03:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * You created it based on the content in the user page, right? Seems like an uncontroversial histmerge. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No -- I used the references listed in the article (Treeing Tennessee Brindle), which I created before I found the userpage. Anna  talk 14:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Fairly decent articles that appear out of nowhere from single edit accounts are often plagarism? Delete as a copyright infringement of http://treeing-tennessee-brindle.dog-for-sale.info/?lts=100204181724  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)  Sorry, that page is copied, with attribution, from the userpage.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's plagiarized. On the bottom of that page, it says "This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "User:Hummelong"". Funnily enough, the history section covers an entirely different breed and seems to have been nabbed from its article: Blackmouth Cur Anna  talk 12:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Convert to a brief userpage for with a link to Treeing Tennessee Brindle.  Consider merging content.  Do not keep as-is because there is now a mainspace article on the subject, and content forks should be avoided.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I would like to emphasize that I strongly oppose merging. I've now found that all content was taken from the Blackmouth Cur article, some of it changed or modified to a certain degree and some not at all. Compare to the version from the same time period: duplication detector. Additionally, everything is unsourced. Anna  talk 14:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Understood. In that case, delete and leave a note at User talk:Hummelong pointing to Treeing Tennessee Brindle.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, Plagiarism, and the GFDL attribution violation. Cunard (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.