Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HurricaneCraze32/Hurricane Dolly (1996)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. User did not express objections here. El_C 06:31, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

User:HurricaneCraze32/Hurricane Dolly (1996)
Already a Hurricane Dolly (1996) article, and user hasn't worked on page since creation Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. The existing article is far better. --Core des at (talk) 18:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above. Badbilltucker 19:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (although probably didn't need to come here - if you'd talked to the author they would probably have db-ownered it if they didn't want it. I've informed them of the listing). Yomangani talk 23:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.