Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IJA/Hitler was a wanker

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Per Userboxes, userboxes should not be divisive, but the community isn't much divided over the claim that Hitler was a wanker. --RL0919 (talk) 02:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

User:IJA/Hitler was a wanker
Do we really need this type of profanity in an already polemic userbox? Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 10:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Gee -- this is too nasty? There are far worse userboxes out there - and this is well within WP norms for such. Collect (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not particularly divisive to call Hitler a wanker. If we had a WikiProject Neo-nazi that wanted this deleted, it might be a different matter. But we don't.  Gigs (talk) 14:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Love the red text on a slightly-different-shade-of-red background. Perhaps this should be deleted just to protect everyone's vision.  Snotty Wong   comment 22:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I see no real reasons why we should delete this userbox. Many people have the opinion that Hitler guy was a bit of a wanker and for this reason I say keep! IJA (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a bit of a stretch. The word "wanker" is not profanity. Just about every politician is a wanker - Hitler especially.  EdEColbert  Let me know 06:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, disparagement of human sexuality through the use of an autoerotic reference as an insult Keep, swearing/nudity/etc can sometimes be legitimate (WP:NOT). A context-sensitive evaluation is required. Note that some online English-language encyclopedia projects, such as the Citizendium and Conservapedia are content restricted for "family friendliness"; editors uncomfortable with material permitted by Wikipedia policy may wish to contribute there instead. Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.