Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IWikepidsacusk

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: '''Delete all. Without prejudice for any of these pages to be recreated by their associated user in accordance with the userpage guidelines.'''. — xaosflux  Talk 15:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

User:IWikepidsacusk

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Pointless user page for an account that hasn't edited in a while.  Mori Calliope fan   talk   07:47, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Does not violate any user page guidelines. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:21, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, the nominator should have mentioned that it was created today by another user. Not sure of the correct procedure here. Pawnkingthree (talk) 12:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Well seeing that one account is Indef blocked, looks like we have a sockpuppet case. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * User:I am Being Here to Help You may just be an enthusiastic newbie trying to help without understanding our guidelines, which is not uncommon. The simplest thing, per the discussion on their talk page, may be to just G7 tag the pages they created. Pawnkingthree (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Oops, yeah I forgot to mention that a new user created these pages. This discussion is why I think creating pages like what I've nominated are not appropriate. For the case of a sockpuppet account, I don't think it's likely, because this user appears to be a good faith user that doesn't want to cause trouble.  Mori Calliope fan   talk   16:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, I understand. :) I am Being Here to Help You (talk) 07:50, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - This should be mentioned at WP:SPI, WP:ANI or brought to the attention of a clerk for potential socking. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - How does "IWikepidsacusk is a Wikipedia user." run afoul of the user page guidelines? weeklyd3  ( block &#124; talk &#124; contributions) 16:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously. These pages include a totally pointless, information-free, user page for a vandalism-only account blocked since 2020, and another equally pointless one for an efitor who hasn't edited for eight years. Why on earth would anyone want to keep them? Also, even in the case of active editors, they have the right to decide whether to have a user page, and if so what it should contain, so under normal circumstances it is not acceptable to create user pages for other editors. JBW (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nothing inherently problematic in these pages.  Refer to SPI, and do not delete unless requested or agreed by and SPI clerk or checkuser.  MfD should not be used for shadow SPI clerking.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural close to break the train into two trains. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all as not created by the user in question. None of the other reasons for deletion provided are convincing, however, as the amount to nothing more than a rehash of CAT:TEMP, which we stopped doing around 2010. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all - I'm sure it's just a total coincidence that the name is an anagram of "Wikipedia sucks", but mostly these pages just don't serve any purpose to keep around.--🌈WaltCip - (talk)  14:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Beside finding the anagram in question as problematic, I see this as quite pointless and worthless in general. —Sundostund (talk) 09:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.