Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Ikip/Heaven Or Hell


WP:STALEDRAFT, untouched since 2009. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Mere age is an insufficient reason for removal, especially given the relatively "together" presentation of what information is there. Jclemens (talk) 06:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * In isolation, no. Did you look at the history though, Jclemens? Deleted, worked on not at all, and then left there in Ikip's userspace along with dozens of other examples. Calling this a stale draft would be charitable. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Stale draft that hasn't been edited since February 2009. MJ94 (talk) 12:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP isn't someone's userspace, and this is an extremely stale inactive draft. 2 1/2 years without being touched is abandoning it. Dougweller (talk) 16:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- Textbook example of a WP:STALEDRAFT. This userfied deleted article hasn't been touched since Feb '09, and Ikip/Okip hasn't touched the mainspace for over a year and a half. Reyk  YO!  20:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  02:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.