Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ikip/blp

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Spartaz Humbug! 16:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Ikip/blp


Miscellaneous links and the like on a sub-page of a blocked user. Illia Connell (talk) 05:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Adding some 140 additional subpages of this blocked user

Illia Connell (talk) 06:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * These were missed when Ikip became Okip (his hoarded userspace junk under the new account name was deleted last year). None of them appear to serve any continued value. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Some of the listed pages are redirects. Should the redirects themselves or their destinations be deleted? --BDD (talk) 20:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I looked at a few of the redirects: some of the targets are other pages on the list, (ie, redirects to other User:Ikip subpages); some are subpages of User:Okip and some are other user pages. I suggest that here we delete only the redirects themselves and not the targets (unless the targets are already listed here).  I'll look at the remaining subpages of Okip and list those at another CfD. Regards, Illia Connell (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Done - Miscellany for deletion/Subpages of retired User Okip Illia Connell (talk) 22:52, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Against deletion Do any of these violate any rules? If so, which ones?  I see nothing wrong with him having personal essays.  And he got himself blocked on purpose because he was addicted to Wikipedia posting.  He had his password scrambled as Ikip, and then created Okip when he came back to Wikipedia, then got himself blocked.   D r e a m Focus  03:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Not intrinsically violative of userspace rules at this point. Collect (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inadequate information in the nomination. Who was Ikip, why is he blocked still, why are these pages a problem. Some of the pages have policy relevance, and such pages we should note delete others' policy comments without very good reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.