Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:In8oo/In-Goo Kwak

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

User:In8oo/In-Goo Kwak

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 17:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 12:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Completely fails N and V. Maybe a test page, but of no use to anyone. Legacypac (talk) 06:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Prefer to blank with Inactive userpage blanked. It is the user's autobiography.  At least he made a couple of other edits.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom - No evidence of notability fails GNG (Personally I think it's pointless in blanking something that'll never be revisted again and something the creator won't ever do anything with again, Better off deleted IMHO). – Davey 2010 Talk 19:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It's pretty promotional, and only follows the subject through high school. There are a some published reports about him: NY Times, and an accompanying video, an opinion piece, and  articles from two university papers,here and here. Notability for an article is not there at this time. User biographies are supposed to be about their editing activities and areas of interest, so this shouldn't be saved for that reason.  Blanking or deletion would be acceptable, but it shouldn't be left visible.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.