Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Insight2016/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  G4 speedy deleted. Draft started as an empty sandbox but contents copied without attribution after the MFD was completed .Ricky81682 (talk) 07:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Insight2016/sandbox


I'm not sure if this is eligible for G4, but it's a copy of the article deleted by Articles for deletion/Elijah (Web Series). If it's not G4 eligible, it's definitely a WP:FAKEARTICLE that should be deleted, given the evidence that was shown in that AfD that most of the assertions of notability were hoaxes. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 12:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.