Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Itshayfevertime

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete - yes, I know it's a bit early, but with the high number of delete votes, and not even a single keep, I think the result is clear now. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Itshayfevertime
Prior and concurrent related discussions:  Wikipedia is not for self-promotion - user pages are not for people to peddle or hawk their wares. Cameron Scott (talk) 20:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Deletion_review/Log/2009 April 12
 * Delete -- userpages are not for hosting your preferred version of articles.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 01:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - continued pushing of a nn book. MikeWazowski (talk) 02:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Userspace is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 05:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - shameless advertisement, should be deleteable as spam. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:55, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment has previously also been posted at User:Onthemap, User:BonfireCharlie, User:Many A Flower and User_talk:Many A Flower. Clearly part of an ongoing campaign to push this onto wikipedia. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 20:00, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This guy should give it a rest already. The sad thing is that now the Cooper book has a publisher it has a half-decent chance of becoming notable. But the ill will created by all the shenanigans (re-creations under different titles and in user space) will probably just make things more difficult for it. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above and WP:NOTADVERTISING. Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. User is now blocked, please tag with   after this discussion closes.   Sandstein   11:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, which I have basically done. The image is on commons, so nothing we can do about that here, so I just removed it from the page and dropped Sandstein's template on. Kindzmarauli (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.