Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ivan Ješík

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was author deleted as CSD U1 NAC. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 22:10, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Ivan Ješík
Per WP:NOTFACEBOOK. This user page was filled with very personal information, which I've blanked for the time being. User has no edits to any namespace other than User and User Talk. See also the discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. RL0919 (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC) Thank You very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan Ješík (talk • contribs) 15:08, 31 August 2010
 * Speedy speedy delete - page contains non-trivial personal details (names, addresses, phones bank accounts). No way to indicate if the user account belongs to the person indicated. --Errant[tmorton166] $(chat!)$ 15:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and maybe salt, no evidence this guy wants to edit articles. His parking tickets?  Come on. PhGustaf (talk) 15:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've deleted it and restored it without the life history. What to do with the rest, I'll leave up to the MfD. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   15:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete permanently. Zero edits outside of his resume. Drmies (talk) 15:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This particular user page belongs to an ostensibly inactive user. Not in itself a criterion, but it does seem to contravene WP:NOTFACEBOOK. It ultimately does not benefit the project and, indeed, the personal details put the author and the project at potential risk. -- Kinu t /c  15:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTFACEBOOK, block if he tries to restore it. There was an obscene and bewildering amt of personal info there before it got blanked. Tarc (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; user is using Wikipedia like a webhost and putting all sorts of information on there that should not be there.  — fetch ·  comms   16:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per everyone above. Not much else to say.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 17:10, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Oversight right now. Delete at end of MfD and protect as redlink.  Yes I saw the old contents.  Also save any extant checkuser data in case this was a joe job.  67.119.3.248 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and oversight. I saw this before it was deleted, and it seems kind of moot to recommend deletion now that it's been removed from the pages history, but I want to at least recommend that it stay deleted and that it be oversighted.  Posting this much personal information about oneself is too potentially dangerous to keep around (and it is bordering on criminal if it is about someone else).  Peacock (talk) 19:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate why HJ Mitchell chose to delete the old revisions while the discussion was still going on, but I do think this discussion is still relevant. It will establish a firm basis for future G4 speedy deletions (if needed), and we can also discuss whether the revisions should be oversighted (I agree they should) or the page salted (I don't think that is appropriate for a person's main userpage unless there is repeated recreation of inappropriate material). --RL0919 (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Way too much personal information on that page, whether his or someone else (yes, I saw the content; left a message on his talk page). 86.147.211.184 (talk) 20:09, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, salt and indefinitely block the guy. Gross case of using Wikipedia as a free host. &mdash; RHaworth 20:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and Oversight. Even if genuine, this person needs to be protected from his own carelessness. Quasihuman (talk) 20:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, Oversight WAY too much info, it seems. Access Denied talkcontribs editor review 03:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.