Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:J.Gowers/Tenison Road Triangle

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. JohnCD (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

User:J.Gowers/Tenison Road Triangle


Was deleted as hoax article from mainspace (Tenison Road Triangle), WP:FAKEARTICLE Bulwersator (talk) 17:10, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Related: Files_for_deletion/2012_January_5 Bulwersator (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unless J.Gowers can give a reason for working on this in userspace. -- Klein zach  02:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not working on it - just preserving it there - it took me about an hour to write, so I'd hate for it to be gone for good. I'm thinking of adding a few more humorous non-articles to my Userspace.  It should be quite cool!  J.Gowers (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * See WP:FAKEARTICLE, especialy as this "humorous non-articles" was placed in mainspace. You can copy it to uncyclopedia/your computer etc Bulwersator (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that's not as easy as it sounds - I really need it to be on here, as only Wikipedia uses the right kind of markup. Also, I'm going to have to ask you guys not to delete TenisonRoadTriangle.png, as it's quite a necessary part of the article.  Thanks anyway for bearing with me: of course I understand that you have the best interests of Wikipedia at heart and that this was just a simple misunderstanding.  XX J.Gowers (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete:Sorry J.Gowers, but your personal web hosting space for humorous articles is one of those things that Wikipedia is not...  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 20:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Page has potential WP:BLP issues, giving apparent home streets for two individuals (if authentic). Agricolae (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. OK; I finally got around to reading the WP pages, and I suppose that this sort of thing isn't really what Wikipedia is for.  I'm really sorry; I don't want to get on the wrong side of anyone here, so I think it's best that you delete the page.  J.Gowers (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I tagged this page as "This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion in good faith, either explicitly or by blanking the page. See CSD G7. ", good luck with your editing Bulwersator (talk) 13:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to Uncyclopedia. This is clearly not something which fits on Wikipedia. You could create your own Mediawiki project at community or any other free host if you need support for the markup. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. We don't host humour unless the subject is related to the project and there is some conceivable project-related educational purpose.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.