Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  nomination withdrawn. 28bytes (talk) 21:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Jack Merridew


Jack is transcluding this page out to an army of sockpuppets to try and soapbox. I used to be very supportive of Jack, but enough is enough. This page, at this point, exists only so that Jack can abuse Wikipedia with it.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  09:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Query It doesn't seem likely that this problem user is going to go away completely. The number of accounts and IP addresses that they have used is quite large and confusing.  New editors who are not familiar with the history of this matter may find it quite difficult to understand what or who is meant by Jack Merridew if this page is deleted.  Is there some better informational page to which it could be redirected to summarise the matter?  This should list the various known aliases of this user and the current applicable sanctions.  Warden (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note I have replaced the rant that prompted the transclusions and the MfD with a blocked user template. Amalthea  09:45, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm not sure deletion is warranted. Blank and protect. Miss E. Lovetinkle (talk) 10:18, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Both this page and the associated talk page (which would inevitably suffer 'incidental deletion') contain a lot of history pertinent to understanding why Jack has had such a raw deal. Although it would be convenient for some – particularly if the talk page's history were to disappear from the view of ordinary editors – it is in the best interests of the encyclopedia that everyone is able to see those histories for themselves. The pages as they stand cannot be used for any nefarious purpose, so deletion is not needed to meet those concerns. --RexxS (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn per Amalthea's action.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  21:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.