Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. MER-C 19:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic


Unused template from an indefinitely blocked user that looks like policy and should be deleted per FAKEARTICLE. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - he's been gone a few years now, he's not coming back, no point in keeping this stuff around. BOZ (talk) 02:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and user, who requested the page's deletion back in 2009 which never happened for unknown reasons. Ego White Tray (talk) 05:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmm, would it be appropriate for me to speedy delete it myself and close this MfD? If not, I'll call it a nomination withdrawn once it's moot. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't care one way or the other, but it's worth noting that the page *was* deleted when Jack requested it; it was also restored a couple of times on his command. See the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3AJack+Merridew%2FUnencyclopaedic relevant logs]. Graham 87 05:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.