Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jackmarshall052104/Sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Jackmarshall052104/Sandbox


Wikipedia is not a web host for fantasy elections. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jackmarshall052104/Sandbox. Whpq (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nonsense by this editor has already been deleted once at this forum. Looking over the editor's history, the next stop is probably Arbitration Enforcement.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: I thought the point of letting people run their own MediaWiki installations was so they could keep their cack off Wikipedia. Clearly I was wrong.    SITH   (talk)   11:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Jackmarshall052104 in recognition of the fact that the fantasy election content has been removed and this content would now be suitable for a userpage. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The editor just did this alteration of everybody's !votes. Also note that This is not the first time the editor has misused Wikipedia as a web host.  In addition to this being the second AFD using his sandbox as a web host, he used a sockpuppet account of User:ChristopherJmesTothFan for the same thing.  Not only that, user:Anthony Bradbury provided an explicit and strongly worded warning about the misuse of user space as a web host.  Given all this, and the the sandbox is two short sentences he could add to his user page easily, deleting this nonsense rather this moving it makes more sense. -- Whpq (talk) 18:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * In light of the fact that the editor has been blocked for altering other people's recommendations, delete. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The next step is WP:ANI. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Originator indeffed as not here to be constructive. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:53, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.