Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JakeAndJosh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk  12:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

User:JakeAndJosh
Delete - self-promotion by SPA, no other edits outside the user page. Also managed to attract an attack on its second day of existence. Otto4711 (talk) 03:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator's reasoning. - Mgm|(talk) 08:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as never likely to meet WP:N Jclemens (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. WP is not a web host. DigitalC (talk) 04:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly non notable topic, will probably be speedy deleted if ever moved to article space. Written in a non-NPOV, very unencyclopedic manner as well. C h a m a l  talk 11:39, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just somebody promoting their non-notable webshow.- Marcusmax ( speak ) 02:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam. COI. Don't know how it attracted an attack so quickly, it's not like it's notable. The redlinks threaten Wikipedia's main namespace with ads. [Phlygh  t ]  16:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.