Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jakkinx/endlesspage




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 01:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

User:Jakkinx/endlesspage
WP:UP. No encyclopedic value. –Katerenka ☆ 03:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * HOLD IT!!!! These are both sub User Pages!!! Can't I even be allowed to have subpages?!  And by the way, in about one minute, I will be blocked from my Internet by parental controls because I have to go to bed, so I won't be able to continue this discussion!!! THis is OUTRAGEOUSLY UNFAIR!!! Are you even an Administrator at all?!!!--Jakkinx (talk) 03:57, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't have to be an administrator to nominate pages for deletion. In addition, you will find that WP:UP refers specifically to user space and not article space. I'm sorry that you feel this is unfair, as it is nothing personal. –Katerenka  ☆ 04:02, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing personal, I once made a page like this. Well, I didn't actually. Sorry, Lord Spongefrog,  (I am the Czar of all Russias!)  09:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - trust me, I got into a BIG fight about this. Its not worth it.-- Coldplay   Expert  10:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No encyclopedic value. Also the corresponding page User_talk:Jakkinx/endlesspage.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ TALK 10:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

oh, watever. delete it if you must. i don't have the energy for this.--Jakkinx (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe MfD should be oldest at the top? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? Gigs (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Because in reading and editing form the top, I find that in these three related User:Jakkinx MfDs, I've commented in the uppermost (newest) one, but most others have commented in this lowermost (oldest) one. To systematically contribute to all MfDs, it is best to start from the bottom and move up, which is counter-intuitive.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * A pretty good point. Bring it up on the talk page and I'll support trying it out for a while at a minimum. Gigs (talk) 01:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about that. Two of the pages were nominated individually. I played the "game" and found two more pages. As they had already begun voting it seemed more appropriate to nominate them separately.  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ TALK 20:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Outside the scope of the project  Chzz  ►  11:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.