Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JamikaPolama/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Deleted fairly clear WEBHOST as the user hadn't made any other useful contributions here, amongst the other issues noted below. Skier Dude ( talk ) 01:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

User:JamikaPolama/sandbox


Fantasy Reality Show Page, this has been the user's only contribution to the site since joining. Given a warning, but ignored. Shadow2 (talk) 21:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know if there's been enough of an attempt to engage that editor and it's difficult to determine what exactly the subject of the article is just from the article itself. It appears that it may be a legitimate show and this user is not just using Wikipedia as a WP:WEBHOST. The page hasn't been up for a whole month yet and it is a users sandbox so it may be a good idea to wait a little bit here. OSborn arfcontribs. 19:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not a legitimate show, it's yet another made-up Amazing Race, like I used to have before mine were taken down. Shadow2 (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I think we should let it be for the moment, not to WP:BITE this editor. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid experimentation in sandbox by new user. --Surturz (talk) 04:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * So I can put my fantasy pages back up then? Again, this isn't real. This is not representative of any real Amazing Race season that has ever aired or will be airing. It is Made up. I had made up pages that were taken down very suddenly without people telling me on my talk page. Shadow2 (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are an editor in good standing with constructive contributions to article space, I'd personally say "yes, go for it!". I'm in the minority though. The userspace police around here love picking on userspace pages that might imply you are a real human with interests outside WP :- { --Surturz (talk) 21:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There's "experimentation", and there's using Wikipedia as a Web host. We're not obliged to indefinitely host fake articles, and there's zero evidence that this user is here to contribute. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - There was no warning given on the user talk page. There's no evidence of it being ignored as noted in the nom. Did you check that the user has made harmful or disruptive edits before issuing a warning? What was the reason for not using a standardized message? Why did you think the ultimatum, "Please delete this, or we will be forced to delete it for you." justified? -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 08:08, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * (sigh) You people can really flip flop on issues sometimes. Last time I brought up a page like this, it was deleted instantly. Also, [b]mine[/b] were deleted instantly. I'm trying to make things fair here, thank you very much Shadow2 (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * All right, it seems the user has finally complied. Shadow2 (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * DELETE. A number of reality TV show forums encourage the use of Wikipedia user pages to host various forum-related games and activities. This seems to be the case here because JamikaPolama has spent months making hundreds of edits to this page, but making no other contributions to Wikipedia.  This is a clear violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST.  Peacock (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete  page has been around since 27 May, and user has made virtually no edits to any other page. It does appear the user is using this as webhost. OSborn arfcontribs. 17:48, 12 July 2012 (UTC) It appeared that the user maintained the content after blanking it, but this was not the case. OSborn arfcontribs. 16:13, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid Sandbox use - and not here for anywhere near 6 months to be a STALEDRAFT. 6 months will be in December 2012 if nothing is done.  Nosound reason to delete - ergo Keep. Collect (talk) 21:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't know why the two above voted "Delete" after the user complied and removed the fantasy reality show and began using it for valid experimentation. 174.1.50.249 (talk) 08:13, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. A user sandbox can be used for testing if and only if there is no misleading information that can pass as fact. A review of the page reveals TV show titles such as They'll Kill Me!, Evil Hospital, and See What Is Under the Surprise. The number of U.S. viewers are 9.93 million, 13.20 million, and 15.81 million, respectively. Someone who has little familiarity with U.S. shows may be under the impression that these are real titles and real statistics when in fact they are mere fiction. Per Wikipedia is not for things made up one day and WP:NOTWEBHOST of fiction, this material (here is the current revision I am viewing) must be deleted as a misleading and inappropriate use of userspace. Cunard (talk) 22:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Notice: The user has moved his previous Fantasy Reality page to a brand new user sandbox. I will be nominating this one as well, so please contribute here Shadow2 (talk) 08:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * See also Sockpuppet investigations/JamikaPolama. Cunard (talk) 01:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.