Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jannerud/Jan Nerud Engineer Producer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. --BDD (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

User:Jannerud/Jan Nerud Engineer Producer


Stale draft from 2011 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:50, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see a reason to delete this. Malarky snarky (talk) 19:04, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment struck as account is subject to a CheckUser block. —  Scott  •  talk  19:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
 * "Stale drafts", as in pages that are merely "stale drafts", should be blanked with the template Inactive userpage blanked instead of being brought to MfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Draft about a non-notable engineer. There is no evidence that this is a work in progress and there is no evidence that there is a likelihood of this becoming notable in the future. Rather than replacing the page with a template, the editor has been notified about this and if they return and they (or anyone else) thinks it's a worthy topic, it can be WP:REFUNDED. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, "now that we are here", however I think User:TenPoundHammer should have blanked it with the template. Deleting because it can be refunded if deleted is somewhat loopy logic, when the wiki is already working as a wiki.
 * Admittedly, I was influenced by the word "Engineeer". When I look closely, including at the sources, I see promotion, and would have immediately agreed if the nomination sought deletion due to it being essentially promotion of music.  Promotion is listed at WP:NOT, unlike "Stale draft from 2011".  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:17, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete stale draft with no apparent likelihood of becoming an article anytime soon. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:42, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.