Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jarrett O'Hearn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Withdrawn. Glass  Cobra  18:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Jarrett O'Hearn
Although user page is semi-protected, and states it is a user page, it still violates criteria. These being WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:PROMOTION and lastly WP:UP. -- Marcusmax ( speak ) 01:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - related to this user is User:JJO... but this related user has not made any edits and the account creation log does not show anything either... but the page content and subject matter is the same as the one nominated.
 * Clear case for CSD-U2, but for it's also quite strong evidence this guy is just wanting to write about and publicize himself, so leave it until this AfD runs its course. DMacks (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Looking closer, could also be user trying to do the right thing and others recreating it. Lots of apparent real-world "friends" goofing off on these pages. Regardless, none of the material is notable and user shows no evidence of being here to build the encyclopedia itself. DMacks (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete -- this is a bit tough for me from the new-ness of the account, but the complete focus on this user page, and the related noted above, is an issue -- it does seem that between his userpage(s) and the deleted article on himself, he is using WP as an advertising/promotional stand.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 04:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Blank/ delete . As a deleted bio, failing to demonstrate our minimum threshold of notability, it should be deleted.  As a userpage, the amount of information is far out of proportion of the users contributions to the encyclopedia.  If the user contributes elsewhere, then some information is OK.  If the user has no interests in contributing to other subjects, then he is just using wikipedia for self promotion, meaning that we will remove or delete the material on sight.  Refer the user to Alternative outlets  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. User has only begrudgingly even done the bare minimum to avoid speedy (keep ) after being warned. Given the pp history too, he seems to treat this as his personal webhost, not an anyone-can-edit site or encyclopedia. DMacks (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not your free web host. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 21:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Question - My user page has already been condemned to deletion, so why continue the discussion when the page's fate has already been decided? Unless anyone besides me thinks that the user page was fine the way it was. Just a thought Jarrett O&#39;Hearn (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Withdraw as Nom - After contacting the user, the page has been cleared of the material originally mentioned for this mfd. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 18:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Close. After receiving an explanation, the user has complied.  Regarding other peoples userspace, we should use dialogue first, MfD only when it fails.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - The only issue now is the page User:JJO, that contains similar content. After this is closed, an eye will need to be kept on these pages, if it starts up again. This is based on the fact that this content has appeared in many random places including article space. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 02:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * As a side note, there have been past disscusions about the material on the users talk page, as is evident in the history. Although next time I should be more welcoming. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 03:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.