Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jazz2jazz/Benjamin C. Sands, Jr. (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:31, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Jazz2jazz/Benjamin C. Sands, Jr.
MfDs for this userpage: 

In the previous MfD, I wrote:

Over four months later, I stand by the position that this page should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Probably Delete. This one is close to the line, but I think it fails.  I think "promotional" & "spam" is too harsh.  It is sourced, and a serious effort by a newcomer was made to source it.  One, http://www.swdc.org/news/news_archive/Southwester_JUNE_2006.pdf in particular comes close to demonstrating notability, but in the end I think not because the source makes no tranformational commentary about the subject.  The other several sources are either what we call "non-reliable", or contain only pasing mentions.  I would support someone's motion to move this to mainspace, but on the current state I would !vote "delete" at AfD.  The authors statement I apologize if I did something wrong... this is a valid entry I think... This was my first attempt so I welcome ways to make it better. It's not complete either I have more to add is to his credit.  Possibly, the page could just be blanked in expectation of the author returning with more sourced material.  Alternatively, if we delete, advise the user that he may request undeletion if he has more to add.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete per SmokeyJoe. I originally said 'keep' but six months have now passed. -- Klein zach  09:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.