Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/GWSkeptic

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 20:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Jc-S0CO/Userboxes/GWSkeptic

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

At this point there is a strong scientific consensus that anthropogenic climate change is a real, serious threat and global warming denialism is up there with anti-vax and Qanon as a destructive conspiracy theory. This might’ve gotten a pass back in 2007 but it’s high time we deleted this. Dronebogus (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Science is tolerant of skepticism of its own relatively recent conclusions, and scientists are often skeptical of a lot of stuff. Global warming skepticism isn't a conspiracy theory but a scientific error, and error has the right to discuss, which is part of the scientific process.  The nominator is rag picking.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Scepticism is healthy. It is not extremism, evangelism, or asserting dubious "facts".  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.