Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jeffvlaming/Jeff vlaming

Closing instructions 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep.--Aervanath (talk) 13:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Jeffvlaming/Jeff vlaming
Spam in userspace. Reads like copyvio. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. New user.  This nomination is too bitey.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, per WP:BITE. It's a AGF nomination, but new user could use some help before having user subpage deleted. — Becksguy (talk) 04:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Agree it reads a little copyvio, but also reads like beginnings of an article, and this would be legitimate use of userspace suppage. Quick research shows Jeff Vlamming to be a writer (screenplays etc) and could potentially be notable under criteria. Given "username", however, user should be made aware of relevant policies, particularly WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO and WP:BLP (specifically WP:BIOSELF) before proceeding.-- Club Oranje T 11:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a violation on its face -- hence no reason to delete and a positive one to Keep. Collect (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-promotional, and editor's only contribution. If he wants to contribute, no one's stopping him. --Calton | Talk 18:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.