Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jenvidanes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Core desat  22:20, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Jenvidanes
User's only edits have been to repeatedly recreate Dicta License, to the point the article had to be salted, and to recreate the article in userspace. Prod disputed with reason "Dicta License deserves a space in Wikipedia" by author. Seraphimblade 14:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

(Note: User's talk page contains same content, but also history. Not sure what the correct way to handle this would be.) Seraphimblade 14:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: THis is a user page, tell the user you are unhappy with the content of this page, don't delete it. Henchman 2000 14:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Extremely Strong Keep: Isn't telling a user about their page what their talk page is for? There is no reason for this page to be deleted, after all, where does it say on WP:USER that you can delete someone's page if you don't like it? Bowsy 15:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment User has already been told multiple times this content is unacceptable, and responded by filling the talk page with it! Also, WP:USER forbids the use of the user page for "Other non-encyclopedic material", which one would presume includes band promos/fan pages? Seraphimblade 15:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:USER User has been warned about it, and seems to ignore it. –Llama man 23:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, per Llama man. Wikipedia is WP:NOT MySpace. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 00:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This can't be an article draft, as the corresponding page has been salted (and so the article wouldn't be accepted), so it must be an attempt to use userspace to hold content that shouldn't be anywhere (WP:USER). --ais523 11:21, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt due to user's persistence. Nardman1 02:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt Non-notable bands seem to be figuring out that the mirror sites scrap user space. As user is contributing nothing but vanity over and over, this does not seem to be part of an attempt to set up a Wikihome from which to work. JChap2007 20:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This isn't the first time such an issue has come up. I think it's fair to have a policy of removing user page contents that look like articles, when it is clear they would not be accepted in article space. EdJohnston 01:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as a result of users previous actions.DUBJAY04 02:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt, and block user if he/she brings it elsewhere. WP:NOT -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.