Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jerome501/funnytest

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

User:Jerome501/funnytest

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Trolling/gibberish Dronebogus (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't know what the starting sentence was referring to but whatever it is, this and the remaining links make it a clear violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. &#8212;CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 08:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No encyclopedic purpose. Curbon7 (talk) 16:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia shouldn't be a storage area for nonsense like this. —Sundostund (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:G3. This is not just trolling, but also blatant vandalism. 2601:647:5800:4D2:1020:7666:46FD:5CD5 (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per G3. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I guess, as unused gibberish and NOTWEBHOST. But, really, why are we spending time policing user space like this? Seems pretty harmless.... Martinp (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2022 (UTC). Editing to add: seems user has been indefinitely blocked for trolling/NOTTHERE, which is doubtless sound. Do we have any less effort-intensive process how such user(sub)pages would be noncontroversially (speedy?)deleted after user -- in this case predictably -- stays blocked for months/years? We don't want to keep NOTTHERE users' digital detritus around for ever, but we also don't want to delete indef blocked users' stuff immediately, since may be relevant for dealing with them/their editing, and blocks may be reversed. And we also don't want to be wasting too many users' time judging the degree of merit/gibberish/offensiveness of random abandoned user pages, as we're doing here. Martinp (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.