Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jesse3bears/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Blank. — xaosflux  Talk 03:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Jesse3bears/sandbox


July 2012 userspace copy of Jessica Mauboy with no changes since then. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank and add sandbox notice atop the page. North America1000 16:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete instead as there's nothing to actually suggest this user is going to come after only a few contributions, with there noticeably being 4 years since then, amply enough for anyone to improve this. Not to mention, the article now exists so any serious changes can be acted there. SwisterTwister   talk  04:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Blank and replace with sandbox notice. It seems crazy to delete a sandbox just because it currently contains a redundant page. A sandbox intended to be is a free, anything-goes (as long as it's not harmful) space. There is no harm here. And, repeat, it is a sandbox. A2soup (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a COPIES of the mainspace article that is forbidden. No valid reason to keep and if the long gone user comes back they can start a new sandbox with a single click. Legacypac (talk) 18:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.