Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jhex blacklotus




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep, nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Jhex blacklotus
Attack page. I have blanked it, but there would be no harm in deleting it. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep; it's only an attack page because another editor had vandalized it prior to your blanking. - Jeremy  ( v^_^v  Stop... at a WHAMMY!! ) 20:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep though the user has not edited for almost a year now, the page has been blanked so being an attack page no longer applies. What's the harm of keeping a blank user page? ArcAngel (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep And revert to the real user's last version, which was not apparently an attack page. Warn the vandal, to be sure. Collect (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It was only attack page due to a different user's vandalism. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn Sorry for the confusion. I thought I had checked the history of the page and that the only editor was the user themselves, but I must have looked at the wrong page history by mistake. Nomination Withdrawn. Feel free to close. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.