Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jimmy Slade




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Replace page with blocked user, done by Tan 39. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Jimmy Slade
Indefinitely blocked user; was blocked on 4 December 2009, see Block Log Please do NOT delete his talk page. --Acps110 (talk) 02:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Tag with blocked user, which will add the user page to Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages, where it will linger for a few weeks or months until it is deleted. Or, since it is already at MfD and the user has been blocked for nearly two months (i.e., it is less likely that the block will be overturned), delete. –Black Falcon (talk) 02:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. He can't come back. Why keep his userpage around? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scott5114 (talk • contribs) 04:41, 2010 January 25 (UTC)
 * weak keep. The user may be back, and may be back contributing productively.  Alternatively, note that should this user become unblocked, he will be entitle to have his userpage undeleted.  We should make it easier for him to return unblocked than to create a new user account.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep; user is indefinitely blocked, not infinitely blocked. They are not banned from Wikipedia, formally or otherwise. Tan   &#124;   39  15:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Indefinite is not eternal, as Tan notes. Collect (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Replace page with blocked user. This will preserve the page history. In the event that the user is ever unblocked, the page history can be restored. This way, we can please both sides: the users who don't want the content seen (without digging around in the history), and those who want the content kept just in case the user is ever unblocked. JulieSpaulding 13:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree. Best idea for most cases.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.