Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jj102786/Joshua Lee Jones--Jj102786 (talk) 09:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Link title' Born Oct 27th 1986 @ Blytheville, Arkansas @ 9:14pm 23 yrs of age male,white Caucasion American raised Religion:Pentocostal,Church of God




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Likely a test page. A near exact duplicate, nonetheless. Killiondude (talk) 06:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC) ====User:Jj102786/Joshua Lee Jones--Jj102786 (talk) 09:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Link title' Born Oct 27th 1986 @ Blytheville, Arkansas @ 9:14pm 23 yrs of age male,white Caucasion American raised Religion:Pentocostal,Church of God==== There is no any point in this creation. name of the subpage consists of signature and information about user. The page is duplicate of User:Jj102786 except user added at the bottom that page is retrieved from there.  Ilyushka88  Talk to me 09:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not your web host --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 10:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Nominated at the TEN MINUTE MARK. WP:BITE applies clearly.  Allowed use of space (userspace for short c.v.).  New user who actually did a mainspace edit before anything else.    Argue as one might -- the idea of trying to keep new users off WP is not a good one.  Ask whether a new user should ever end up with as many templates on his user talk page within less than two hours of making an edit. (Yes - his edit should have been on the article talk page, but is that a valid reason for lynching?)  Collect (talk) 11:18, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:USER says Some people add information about themselves as well, possibly including contact information (email, instant messaging, etc), a photograph, their real name, their location, information about their areas of expertise and interest, likes and dislikes, homepages, and so forth. - I can't find anything about putting your biography on there. Although I understand your WP:BITE reasoning, I can't see anywhere that says that putting your biography is a suitable use of a user page. If this was a short CV, I might be more inclined to agree - but it is not. Also, bear in mind that the user tried to create an article about themselves, and then put this on their user space. WP:USER also says Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project - how is the information about his parents, grandparents, etc, relevant to the project? --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 11:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I know that I should have left the user a message before I took the page to MfD. I made a mistake there, and will do so next time. My meaning here is not to bite anyone. I enjoy helping people, not to make them feel bad. I listed this page for deletion as I just can't think of any reason why there should be duplications of userpages in Wikipedia with a title like this (title consists only of user signatures and page content).  Ilyushka88   Talk to me 16:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment See Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:KeithTyler/Resume, Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Johnbuckman  and so on.  And I consider this one "short."  Anything which does not go to a second screen to me is short. YMMV. Collect (talk) 12:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Collect. I don't think this violates WP:UP #3, as the it cannot be considered "excessive personal information (more than a couple of pages)." A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This page is substantially the same as the user's user page User:Jj102786 (which also has an open MfD). If the content is considered sufficient to be kept, I would recommend that this copy is deleted, while retaining the other. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 08:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-unique content with a title that is way too long and detailed.  Presumably, this was a test.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The references to "(talk)" and "Link title" in this subpage's title suggest that the creation of the page was an erroneous duplicate of the user's main user page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.