Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jkxyz/Spartan race

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. signed,Rosguill talk 22:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

User:Jkxyz/Spartan race

 * – (View MfD)

Duplicates Spartan Race with the hosting user's preferred version. All of the information they were trying to force into the article (in between looking up other editors' personal information and serving legal threats, for which they were banned years ago) has been reviewed by neutral editors and incorporated into the main article where appropriate. This page serves no further purpose and should be deleted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:00, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Normally we could Redirect to the article, but it is better to Delete from the userspace of a banned sockpuppeteer. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep without objection to blanking/redirecting. Based on incorporated into the main article where appropriate [by other users], the material should be kept. It's not a great asset, but there's also no need to delete it since it's in userspace, after all. As the user is gone for good, if someone for some reason finds the text objectionable they can just blank it. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 00:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft delete so WP:REFUND can apply here. This was a tough one for me as it's less than my usual five years where I support deletions from abandoned userspaces and because the user is blocked as a sockpuppet. Should the user come back, apologize, profess never to use the sockpuppet accounts again, and be unblocked, we should allow WP:REFUND to apply to the master account. --Doug Mehus T · C  15:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Textbook WP:UP.  Forked content, if used, creates attribution hazards.  Sandboxing is OK, but only if short term, and then deleted.  Do not allow REFUND.  Refer to Spartan Race and its history instead.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I misspoke in my nomination statement. This page was forked from the article by an admin to resolve a dispute involving this user, but there was no content development in this space. Jkxyz never edited this page at all - any substantive changes that were made after this page was created, including everything related to the content dispute, were done in the main article, not in this sandbox. The entire history of this page is creation, admin cleanup of maintenance tags, bots removing deleted images, and my nomination for deletion. It serves no purpose at all. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Right. It’s a sandboxing copy. Sandboxing copies should be deleted when the sandboxing exercise is completed. Leaving sandboxing history in one long sandbox userpage is an unglued thing long tolerated, but when the forked content is under a meaningful title, is an attribution problem begging to happen. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.