Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jobba24/ricky vazquez

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Jobba24/ricky vazquez


Stale userspace draft, owner hasn't edited in over 8 years, no evidence of notability DannyS712 (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SK#1, no valid reason to delete. Ignore, or if you can’t, Inactive userpage blanked was made for you.  Messing with others’ userspace is bad enough, deleting their userspace pages is worst.  It benefits no one and is a rude discovery for the. On their return. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete the premise that someone is going to return and finish a page on a non-notable person is wishful thinking. Send to the dustbin Legacypac (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The premise that long inactive users are never going to return is a self-fulfilling professy and needs to be rejected as such. Respect for past contributors is respect for current contributors and is important for editor retention. WP:Editors matter. Let editors manage their own userspace, barringvery good reasons otherwise. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The philosophical wish that long gone editors will ever manage "their" userspace is wishful thinking. They don't care it seems. Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * One returning editor is worth a thousand who don’t return. There’s also the issue of generally respecting others’ workspace. Clean (blank), by all means, but don’t burn (delete) the stuff on others desks in the backroom where the readers never go anyway. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - Long abandoned, and the editor is long gone. Maybe a campaign to get long-gone editors to return might be noble, but has little to do with abandoned drafts.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a stale draft. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 13:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Blanking with inactive userspace blanked per WP:STALEDRAFT is fine if editors feel action is warranted. No reason to delete or discuss here. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.