Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JoelisJoel/The Quad

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

User:JoelisJoel/The Quad


Stale userspace draft, owner hasn't edited in over 8 years, unsourced with no evidence of notability DannyS712 (talk) 00:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SK#1, no valid reason to delete. Ignore, or if you can’t, Inactive userpage blanked was made for you.  Messing with others’ userspace is bad enough, deleting their userspace pages is worst.  It benefits no one and is a rude discovery for the. On their return. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete unsourced and outdated if it was relevent at one point. The government referred to is out of office. Mussings from a throw a way acct. Legacypac (talk) 01:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * “Outdated” is not a criticism in an historiography document like an encyclopaedia. Musings of a user are appropriate for the user’s userspace, and such things should not be deleted without very good reason. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's an outdated nickname - looks like OR anyway. Never be an article on it's own, maybe, but likely not worth a sentemce on a page about David Cameron's government. Not useable as is or even with a real trim. Legacypac (talk) 02:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - As written, it is incorrect. It might as well be started over if someone wants to start over.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a stale draft. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 13:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Since when is STALEDRAFT a reason to delete someone else’s userspage? This one does not even involve a BLP.  Mulitple RfCs have concluded that they should not be deleted, and that notability is not a question to be decided at MfD. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * In userspace, not a userpage. It is an abandoned draft. Legacypac (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per SmokeyJoe - Blanking with inactive userspace blanked per WP:STALEDRAFT is fine if editors feel action is warranted. No reason to delete or discuss here. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 06:55, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.