Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joelporter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Joelporter (2nd nomination)
Earlier discussion Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joelporter was closed with the result being "Speedy Keep per WP:BITE". But the page had been created on 2007, and not 2008, as User:Dravecky pointed out to me. Since the !votes are based on the impression that the page was created only recently, I'm nominating the page for deletion again for the same reasons as earlier so that we can have another discussion. C h a m a l talk 14:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note I missed this when closing the first time, the speedy keep reason is invalid, this relisting is fine by me. — xaosflux  Talk  15:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I believe it was me that set the tone of the last nomination because I obviously can't tell the difference between 2007 and 2008... Yea the user is inactive and the page is basically an advert. I have to wonder if the original nominator was watching the discussion because *he* never commented on the obvious error and has been editing since the nomination...--Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obvious mistake on last nomination, deserves the boot. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 15:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I just happened to stumble across the original discussion and was intrigued enough to take a peek. It was an easy mistake to make--almost as easy as agreeing that an editor with one edit in a year and that sole edit being to create a self-promotional user page is neither active nor acting in the best interest of the encyclopedia. - Dravecky (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:SOAP. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 16:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joelporter. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral. I just felt I should say something here because I commented last time (and wow, that's a coincidence on the dates, huh?).  I just wanted to state that being "inactive" isn't necessary a reason for deletion, and if this page were acceptable for an active user, it should be for an inactive one.  The reason I'm not going keep here is because I'm not entirely sure this page would be acceptable for an active user, at least one more than 10 minutes old.  --UsaSatsui (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Advert. Wow. I'd like to think I would not have made such a mistake in confusing the dates, but, wow. What a coincidence on the dates. Never see that before. -- Suntag  ☼  07:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Better just to blank these things on sight.  So much less work.  Less bitey too.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.