Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JoeyLovesSports/Save The Simpsons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. ~ Riana ⁂ 01:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

User:JoeyLovesSports/Save The Simpsons
Fails WP:SOAP, WP:BATTLE, and a bit WP:BURO and WP:DEMOCRACY.  Maxim (talk)  19:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It does not fail WP:SOAP; it's not article space, it's not talk space, and it's not promoting anything outside WP. Either these articles will be AfD'd or they won't; in either case the page will be moot in about five days, before this discussion is closed. Go !vote in the AfD's and Leave it alone. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keeping this establishes a precedence to create a bureau/democracy inside Wikipedia userspace because "it's only userspace." Then we'll have Esperanza Act III on our hands, and we'd end up being in worse shape than we would if we had deleted this.--WaltCip 14:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. We don't decide things by petition, and the strong implication here is that someone will go to the AfDs saying "look at our petition, now the article should be kept!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amarkov (talk • contribs) 15:02, 23 August 2007
 * Delete per nom, this is essentially a tool to be used in canvassing. Inappropriate use of userspace. --Core desat 22:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with Nom, in that the user may be well advised to read some of the cited policies - the fact that the effort had no discernable impact on the AFDs makes the attempt no more acceptable. Given that the AFDs referenced have all been resolved (to Keep or No Consensus), and considering that no one at all signed the petition - yeah, this can go. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 03:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's no point - no-one has even signed "the petition". Onnaghartl ! co 14:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.