Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Johnatmicronews/sandbox1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Micro-wiki is the place for this sort of thing. JohnCD (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Johnatmicronews/sandbox


Both the above pages fail Wikipedia criteria for WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTMADEUP. As well as containing BLP violations. Subject is made-up by SPA accounts and sourced to a series of self-published webpages. Subject has been previously speedy deleted and salted as a hoax (e.g., Republic of Catan and Kingdom of Catan) — however, I opened this MFD to establish consensus opinion for further action. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: The first sandbox page was speedy deleted per WP:U5 Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host before discussion could be completed. — Cactus Writer (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, I understand that Wikipedia have certain rules. But they are both my sandbox in my area. I stated that they were work in progress and I am still acquiring reliable sources. I did background and saw that both the pages you listed above were deleted as a hoax. But naturally over the micronational community Catan is known. Admittedly in places not well liked but still known. I see you have many pages in regards to Micronations and that is very pleasing. The Kingdom of Catan is a micronation. It is a real place. If you wish I can find a picture and post it here (please advise how to do so). It has real people as you can see in the images attached, if you wish I will publicly post their public email addresses. I disagree that this is not a Fake Article and believe they should be listed. I agree that the sandbox1 page may have to be deleted for its' lack of reliable sources. But the Catan page has numerous from independent sources. Please enquire further if necessary. Johnatmicronews (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.