Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Johnfullerton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Johnfullerton
Per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Johnfullerton/John Fullerton and these logs. Repeated reposting of material. I think it is inappropriate even on his userpage. Plus he has now added a rant on Wikipedia at the end. Stu  ’Bout ye!  14:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous discussions. Xiner (talk, email) 14:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Is this an encyclopaedia or not? Inappropriate material about a 'living person'. SeanMack 14:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep n. the innermost and strongest structure or central tower of a medieval castle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnfullerton (talk • contribs)


 * Delete per multiple previous discussions. BJAODN the Wikipedia rant. -- Kicking222 19:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a truly unremarkable person's vanity page. It should have been quickflagged A& long ago. Somnabot 14:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a blog, he doesn't meet WP:BIO so it can't be moved to mainspace and per prior discussion. I am reluctant about salting because it is a userpage, but I don't see any positive contributions recently, so I won't oppose it. James086 Talk 06:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.