Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joiedelacruz6/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 10:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Joiedelacruz6/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Sandbox WP:HOAX. The edit of the sandbox is just an imagination of the Solid Kapamilyas on what they want to happen on ABS-CBN on 2022. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as a sandbox draft. Sandboxes and drafts should only be deleted as hoaxes when the untruth can be proved.  If the user submits this to draft space without references, it can be declined as unreferenced.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * the proof where the subject is a hoax is at my reason why it should be deleted. Also the same with Draft:A23 (TV channel) and Draft:Studio TV but the reason only on that MfD is Draft WP:HOAX . These three are untrue. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - I see an unverified statement by User:SeanJ 2007 that the nominated page is a hoax by the Solid Kapamilyas, and an unreferenced sandbox, and I don't even see information as to who the Solid Kapamilyas are, or why this sandbox should be deleted. It is the word of User:SeanJ 2007 against the word of User:Joiedelacruz6.  If the nominator thinks that the other editor is engaging in disinformation or hoaxes, they can make a report to WP:ANI after reading the boomerang essay.  As it is, I don't know whether the nominated page is true or false, and that is enough reason to leave it in draft space.  If the originator of these pages is doing something wrong, WP:ANI may be a less bad forum than MFD.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is really a hoax, Draft:A23 (TV channel), Draft:Studio TV, Draft:Sky Network Television Philippines and this sandbox that has also the edit of Draft:A23 (TV channel) is really untrue. Why?, because these 5 are just an opinion or imagination of the Solid Kapamilyas or Kapamilya Fans on what they like to happen if ABS-CBN will be given a new franchise on 2022. I understand that drafts should not be moved to article space if unreferenced, but these are all hoax and needs to be deleted. No need to let it die within 6 months. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep and decline as unreferenced. It may be better if the user provides references for the still-made sandbox as a 'foundation' of truth and evidence, otherwise, if submitted but not edited, just let it rot. As per the unreal thing, in my realization, it's not at this time. Xingqiu  •  Talk  15:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - If I understand correctly what the nominator is saying, the originator is crystal balling, which is not the same as a hoax. Articles that are based on a crystal ball are sometimes moved to draft space.  When in draft space, they are declined or rejected.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - If the nominator thinks that the originator is engaging in hoaxes, they can make a report to WP:ANI. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Is it okay if I report this to WP:ANI while this MfD is open? SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.