Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jose Arellano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Jose Arellano
Not a real user. A copy of User:Jose and Ricardo, more or less. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-existent user. Xoloz 23:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Allowable if the user switches IDs and begins to actively use this as his logon. Random creation of pages in the userspace, however, should be discouraged.  The user's contribution history indicates potential misunderstandings about Wikipedia's mission and standards.  Rossami (talk) 00:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * While "Random creation of pages in the userspace,...should be discouraged." there is no reason people can't have multiple logons, as established. Rich Farmbrough 16:45 17  May 2006 (UTC).
 * True. The problem is that so far there is no .  The ID has no contribution history.  No one has ever logged on at this name.  A different user simply chose to create a second page in the userspace.  Rossami (talk)
 * Delete per Xoloz. Martinp 01:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no user with this name. -- WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:40, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This basically should be eligible for speedy deletion. DarthVad e r 11:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.