Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jp2uk

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

User:Jp2uk

 * – (View MfD)

Obviously not an appropriate user page. Adam9007 (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft delete/Blank Angry farewell notice of a user who was here for 5 days, 11 years ago. Pretty irrelevant. SK2242 (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete now that we're here, but you could have just blanked it. It's 11 years old and not a BLP violation or anything else that ought to be expunged from the page history. Not really worth bringing here IMO. SpicyMilkBoy (talk)
 * Speedy delete as pure vandalism. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Not true, it is an understandable departing statement. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per User:TheImaCow. Henry20090 (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - As noted, could have been G3, and is the work of a twat. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Deleting unhappy departing statements causes more damage than good.  It is, and smells of, censorship of opinions that you don't like.  Leave it, with the associated user's edit history as an explanation for what went wrong here.  It is yet another case of an enthusiastic newcomer being upset at discovering WP:Notability requirements.  Ideally, Wikipedia would somehow do better with this problem.  We have tried to find solutions, it is difficult, but deleting the evidence of an unhappy attempted contributor is not a solution.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. While I agree with SmokeyJoe's reasoning, I don't think there's any reason to leave personal attacks intact.  Java Hurricane  09:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. We don't need this.--WaltCip (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.