Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jsnyder3131/Joy and Tom Studios

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

User:Jsnyder3131/Joy and Tom Studios


Not edited since 2010, looks like conflict of interest in any case Doug Weller  talk 13:14, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Could have been blanked.  Delete now that we are here, hopelessly promotional with unsuitable sources, minimally WP:TNT applies.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatantly promotional, with fire. Wikipedia is not for advertising.  This is a good textbook example of what is not allowed in Wikipedia, with wording such as "highly regarded" and "noted for their ability".  No, it would not have been sufficient to blank this.  Anything short of a delete will be too little.  (It appears that this came to the attention of an administrator because of unrelated edits to a politician.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It is definitely not OK, but ancient userspace transgressions are sufficiently cleaned by blanking, and bringing every such page to MfD is unnecessary as well as disruptive. You can search to find thousands of examples, eg.  Feel free to check them all and blank the promotion, do not bring them to MfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.