Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jtankers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep because the user removed the questionable content, making the original nomination moot. --Jaysweet (talk) 12:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Jtankers
Blatant WP:SOAP violation. Jaysweet (talk) 17:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Could you have some common civility and request compliance. I am more than happy to comply with any admin request. I immediately removed any content I thought might be in violation of WP:SOAP as soon as this was brought to my attention via this action. --Jtankers (talk) 01:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The material on there belongs on LHC facts, not on a Wikipedia user page.-Wafulz (talk) 18:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * (Background: I am and editor of Safety_of_the_Large_Hadron_Collider fighting censorship of papers from professors of Math, Physics and other theoretical sciences questioning safety arguments made by CERN. I also assist with legal efforts in US Federal Court against defendent in default CERN seeking reasonable proof of safety prior to operation.  I also am the founder and co-administrator of LHCFacts.org.  I have been reported today by CERN supporters including a CERN employee who is also a Wikipedia admin.  Does this smell like  WP:COIN to anyone else?)


 * Keep - User is a single purpose account with a strong bias toward a particular set of fringe theories. His talk page was a problem before because it was cluttered, but that's been cleaned up now.  His user page helps to make his POV known.  (Aside: Jtankers, please drop the persecution hyperbole - it's unbecoming). -- Mark Chovain 02:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't see anything really problematic about this userpage, and it's for an active user. We edit those, rather than MfD. -- Ned Scott 07:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * keep apparent soapboxing was removed by the editor, so no need to delete now. JoshuaZ (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.