Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Juggs4/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep and history merge. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Juggs4/sandbox


Per WP:FAKEARTICLE. This content was deleted by AfD (link). The original creator has userfied it. QU TalkQu 16:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Inquiry - Could you save us all the 30 seconds searching and link to the AFD in question? Achowat (talk) 19:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's already linked. Follow the blue Wikilink above ("AfD" in the sentence that starts "This content was deleted by..."). I guess it isn't very visible actually so I've changed the format. QU TalkQu 21:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I moved the article here to do further work on it. This is my own sandbox page, that's what it's for. --Juggs4 (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes and no. According to WP:FAKEARTICLE "short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable". So it's a question of whether the article, deleted via AfD, can be enhanced to make it a valid article in the "short term". Given the band that is the subject of the article has been inactive since 2003 and isn't notable now this seems somewhat unlikely (IMO). Of course FAKEARTICLE is a content guideline, not a policy so it is a matter of judgement whether it should be applied or not. QU TalkQu 13:18, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * This was created with a cut paste move and does not preserve attribution. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A separate matter, but still one which should be dealt with. Regardless of the result here, the page histories should be merged. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - It was userfied 9 April 2012‎, a little more than a month ago. Short term hosting is about three months IMHO, or at least it's not a little more than a month ago. Yea, there were a lot of SPAs at th AfD and the band has been inactive since 2003. However, seems reasonalbe to give editor another month or two to improve it. Keep and relist on or after 9 July 2012 if needed. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep for now and history merge Amphora (band) to User:Juggs4/sandbox. This seems to be a good faith attempt to work on the article. If no work is done on the draft, I recommend renominating this page for deletion after six months, or after 9 October 2012. A nomination after three months, after 9 July 2012, as suggested by may lead to another "keep" because some editors define "short-term hosting" as at least six months. Cunard (talk) 03:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.