Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Juggs4/sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 12:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

User:Juggs4/sandbox


WP:FAKEARTICLE. Was userfied with over a year ago after deletion at Articles for deletion/Amphora (band). Has since been abandonded without any real improvement. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The editor has been working on the article. REgardless of whether it belongs on Wikipedia in the article space, it's userfied and totally fine to be in his userspace from what I can see. SarahStierch (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * A token edit after this nomination after having left it stale for over half a year. That's not working on it, it's faking it to try preserve this fake article. No attempts have been made to address any of the problems that led to it's deletion.
 * Also see the MFD notice, "You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress." (Bolding mine). duffbeerforme (talk) 00:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotion. No sign of any third party coverage. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Little work has been done on the draft since Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Juggs4/sandbox, where I supported temporarily keeping to allow for work to be done.

WP:UP states (my bolding): "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." A Google News Archive search returns no usable sources. Cunard (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.