Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Junglecat/marriage (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 16:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Junglecat/marriage


Per WP:POLEMIC. Gamaliel ( talk ) 17:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Just like I stated in the abortion discussion, this is another neutrally worded personal opinion infobox, like any other. This user is just stating his side of the sexual preference table; Is Wikipedia now "heterophobic"? Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, not "pro-gay" or "pro-straight". So if users want people to stop talking about sexual preference opinions, you might as well start nominating every sexuality related infobox, like this one. Or better still, personal opinions shouldn't be given on our userpages anymore....thereby eradicating the use of userbox, since that's what it is for anyway (for personal opinions). Bottomline is, this userbox isn't attacking any group of people...therefore, not Polemic.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Nominating this and not User:GlassCobra/SameMarriage at the same time suggests to me this is a politically-based nomination. That's wrong-headed.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  00:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I was not aware of the other userbox, but thanks for the evidence-free accusation! Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.  Happy holidays.   Gamaliel  ( talk ) 04:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: per abuv kip votes. I won't say mre dan dat cuz it mit jst b my lst on Wikipedia. Darreg (talk) 21:17, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: It simply states a user believes in traditional marriage from a Christian viewpoint (at least in my case). There’s nothing polemic about that. JungleCat    Shiny! / Oohhh!  20:31, 27 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.