Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kő Cloch/Netley Central Sports F.C.

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

User:Kő Cloch/Netley Central Sports F.C.


This page appears to have a somewhat tortured history of being moved back and forth from draft/user space and article space. So, this was an article for six months, then a proposed deletion tag was added. The usr who has mainly edited it removed the PROD tag and moved the page back to user space.

Draft/user space is not meant to be a permanent repository of articles on subjects that are not notable enough for an article, and per point 3 at WP:USERFY, it is generally inappropriate to userfy an article without a deletion process.

The creating user was perfectly within their rights to remove the PROD, but at that point it was no longer under threat of deletion and simply taking it seems like ownership behavior. Userfying it without any evidence that the subject is suddenly about to somehow become notable enough for an article after all this time is not ok, either the subject is notable or it isn’t. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is highly unlikely to survive being moved back into mainspace as the club does not meet the notability cutoff for English football clubs, namely having played at the modern level 10 or in the FA Cup/Trophy/Vase. Agree that there may be some ownership issues given this very odd revert that reintroduced several empty sections and incorrect infobox parameters. Number   5  7  20:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: Since the user had been renamed, the page was now located in User:SMADG85/Netley Central Sports F.C.. Matthew_hk   t  c  20:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per N57. GiantSnowman 13:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep in my user space SMADG85 23:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC) Okay, the club hasn't yet played in the FA Vase or any other notable competition as of this moment in time, but that doesn't mean that they won't compete in these tournaments in the future. I understand that it's unlikely that the article will survive the mainspace in its current state, though can it not remain here for the time being. Why should the article be removed from both Wikipedia and my personal user space, if it is to be removed this should only apply to the mainspace. Why should my contributions to this club article go out the window!? I would very much like to continue working on it, so as I may add new information to it. I am a keen researcher.
 * Why has already been explained here repeatedly. Even in your own userspace you don’t own it, and userspace is not meant to be a permanent repository for draft articles. If the subject somehow becomes notable enough for an article in the future it can easily be restored. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Just don't see how this is ever going to become an article that satisfies GNG. If this ever does occur then the article can be readily restored. Fenix down (talk) 11:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.