Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KULADHEIVAM RAJAGOPAL

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

User:KULADHEIVAM RAJAGOPAL


Abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE by non-contributor. jni (delete)...just not interested 20:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This looks like some aborted attempt to create an obituary. There is nothing here that is suitable for mainspace. MER-C 13:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * meh Based on the talk page, this looks like an attempt at an article, after an AfC failed. I don't see evidence that it is fake. Personally, I prefer to wait a year before treating it as abandoned.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * How about writing an article out of this garbage, instead of waiting forever for original user to do it? Or wait forever for some miracle to create something useful out of this close to patent nonsense text? Word "fake" in "fake article" does not refer to subjects factuality but to fake appearance of non-article in a way that people might confuse it as proper material for encyclopedia (e.g. duplicates of articles, content forks, abandoned drafts) jni (delete)...just not interested 17:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.