Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kaimaidment18

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Tagged by Oshwah. as a sockpuppet, so de facto blanked. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

User:Kaimaidment18


WP:UPNOT; userpage being used as a sandbox. I nominated it for WP:U5 but it was declined. User is currently indef'd. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:50, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank. It is not a U5 because it is easily intended for a legit use. Anyone can just blank it as not an appropriate ling term use of a userpage per #UPCOPIES Legacypac (talk) 22:39, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Blank or delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 02:14, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:Kaimaidment18/Mom (season 6) and leave a soft redirect behind. Alternatively, do nothing because it is not really problematic as is. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 08:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why someone would spend the time on a CSD request (with an incorrect rationale, per Legacypac) of a perfectly harmless userpage of a (temporarily?) blocked user, and when I rejected the CSD, would create an MFD (also with an incorrect rationale; people use their userpage as a sandbox all the time). The only reason I can think of is to kick someone while they are down. I'm tempted to say "keep" just as a symbolic criticism of this nomination, but instead I'll just say blank it. If/when the user is unblocked, they can leave it blanked, or restore it to a sandbox, or whatever.  I won't blank this and close it myself, as that would no doubt be considered an out-of-process too-involved supervote. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously hindsight is 20-20 but you are correct that Drm310 could have blanked it per WP:FAKEARTICLE rather than trying to CSD. Equally, you could have blanked it for the same reason when you rejected the CSD. Either of those actions would have resulted in this being a non-issue. Let's all remember that for next time and use this as a learning opportunity. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Blank or delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, and the fact that Mom (season 6) already exists in mainspace. CoolSkittle (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Neutral I don't see a policy about user pages of blocked users. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Admittedly, WP:FAKEARTICLE is not a policy, just a well established guideline. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 03:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment User page has been replaced with sockmaster by, as Kaimaidment18 is suspected of abusing multiple accounts. Therefore the page has effectively been blanked. Ted  Edwards  16:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.