Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kasaalan/sandbox/racheltributes

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Kasaalan/sandbox/racheltributes


per WP:STALEDRAFT. User has not edited this article in over two years, and has not edited at all in over 9 months. Jayjg(talk) 20:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * As weird as this may sound, seeing as this is a continuation of Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie it might be an idea to histmerge there (even though that article was eventually merged) to retain the development history. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:03, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Here is the move sequence of the page: Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie → Public Reaction's to Rachel Corrie's Death → Public reactions to Rachel Corrie's death → Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie

Because Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie was deleted by as "You've had two months to merge any content to Rachel Corrie per Articles for deletion/Artistic Tributes to Rachel Corrie. Moving the article does NOT render the prior Afd moot. Deleting".

KillerChihuahua was the closer of Articles for deletion/Public reactions to death of Rachel Corrie.

KillerChihuhua's closure was endorsed at Deletion review/Log/2009 May 19, Deletion review/Log/2009 May 27, Deletion review/Log/2009 July 8, and Deletion review/Log/2009 October 17.

Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, and because the page was not merged per KillerChihuahua, there is no need to retain this page's history. Cunard (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.