Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Katsmeow777/Legal Suits and Dave Hensan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

19:18, 2 April 2011 User:Ponyo deleted "User:Katsmeow777/Legal Suits and Dave Hensan" ‎ (WP:G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban: sock of User:Stratawatch - subpage being prepared as an attack article)

User:Katsmeow777/Legal Suits and Dave Hensan
draft of an SPA sockpuppet with a title that, although mis-spelled, could be considered an attack title. See Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard for discussion of the subject Sitush (talk) 16:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Probable attack page/ POV fork, never going to contain enough content to justify a split from the main article, creator doesnt seem to have taken any interest in building it anyway. Bob House 884 (talk) 17:07, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I posted this to the BLP section of Wiki.

Hi Sushi, I would like to ask you to reconsider your decision to remove the link I posted and labeled it as vandilism. I thought if an article was published you could add it to the persons page. I only added the link to the published article regarding Dave Hensman to provide validity to the prior person's post. I honestly am not trying to vandalise his page, I am trying to provide a neutral point of view which can be backed up because it has been published. I quote below one of the five pillers of Wiki:

Wiki has a Neutral Point of View:

We strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view, presenting each point of view accurately and in context, and not presenting any point of view as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy: unreferenced material may be removed, so please provide references. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong here. That means citing verifiable, authoritative sources, especially on controversial topics and when the subject is a living person. When conflict arises over neutrality, discuss details on the talk page, and follow dispute resolution.

"we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view" - My article is just that it provides another point of view and should be added to his biography. Thank you for taking the time to hear me out, and I am hopeful that you will agree with me and reverse your decision to remove the link, and label of vandalism.

I can also confirm that yes this is the same Dave Hensman discussed on your Notice Board. David John Hensman is the owner of Teamwork Property and he is using the Wiki site bio site to represent this. Sushi responded to you with confirmation of this April 2, 2011.

I would like to affirm that I in no way have been involved in the suit nor am I one of the Strata Owners of British Columbia who lost their contingency fund due to Dave Hensman. I would also like to confirm that I am not posting this to his site to be malicious. This article has been submitted by various concerned citizens of our province, so much traffic his site was brought into your notice boards for discussion. If Wiki chooses not to allow this published article within Dave Hensman's site would that not be going against the "Neutral Point of View" wiki adheres to? Dave Hensman was convicted in the Courts of British Columbia (this is the document everyone keeps pasting to his page) as well this decision was then published in the Real Estate Council of BC's annual report.

If you require further information or could possibly help me to "do this in the right way" I would be greatful. In closing I would like to say without these published references being added to his site we are denying the public the right to a neutral point of view.

Signed, Katsmeow7777
 * Comment - the "everyone" you refer to seems highly likely to be one person acting as a WP:SOCKPUPPET. Other accounts editing this article have been blocked for this exact reason/similar edits. Should we take this to WP:SPI? - Sitush (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * delete - creator is now indefinitely blocked, no wikipedia reliable sources have been presented t assert that there are and such thing as the title asserts, without reliable citations it should be deleted. Off2riorob (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.