Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kellyrussell34/Ahmed Tarek Bahgat Abaza

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - if someone actually intends to work on it, ask me or anyone in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles. But there isn't a consensus here for keeping it around indefinitely for no one in particular. Wily D 06:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Kellyrussell34/Ahmed Tarek Bahgat Abaza


Abandoned copy of article deleted at afd. WP:FAKEARTICLE duffbeerforme (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article last worked on two days after it was Speedied (G4:Recreation). Clearly just an attempt to house the page, since we won't allow it in the Mainspace. Achowat (talk) 14:09, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
 *  Conditional Keep  If this is notable, move to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Ahmed Tarek Bahgat Abaza. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If it were notable, it wouldn't have been deleted at AFD. Achowat (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That's what confused me, it seamed to be deleted for lack of notability, but if it's not notable why was it turned into a draft? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It's a common tactic that Users seem to do (and they almost always disappear right after that) to "protect" it, either to keep their hard work from literally disappearing or because they just want to keep it up. The result of the discussion was deletion, not userfication. It's up to us at MFD to sweep these up when they happen. Achowat (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I understand. This was a unilateral userrfy that want against the AFD. There was no legitimate reason to userfy because the problem it that the articles topic isn't notable and no amount of improvement to the draft can fix that. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Userspace is not an indefinite repository for deleted content. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable per AFD. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 14:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.